Beagle Board vs. Hammer

The Beagle Board is getting a lot of attention lately. It should, it’s an awesome platform. How does it compare to the Tin Can Tools Hammer (discussed in a previous blog post here)? Well, the Beagle is faster and cheaper for one thing, it also has excellent video and audio output capabilities. But that doesn’t necessarily make it better. It all depends on the application.

If I were wanting to do something like port Ubuntu to Arm and develop or test desktop apps on an ARM based computer, I’d chose a Beagle Board. However the Beagle just doesn’t have the i/o ports I’d want if I were doing embedded hardware/firmware development. The Hammer fits into a standard 40 pin dip socket and gives tons of i/o flexibility so I could do things like build a wifi connected robot or run a CNC.

As a matter of fact, imagine that: Run EMC on the CNC itself! I’ve not heard anyone discuss this but it would be a cool idea. Just plug a wifi usb card into your CNC machine and send jobs by email or the web. Or maybe it could appear as a network printer and you hit the print button from eagle and it spits out a circuit board (far fetched, I know). It would be entirely possible to use something like the Hammer and interface it to your FETs and a nice power supply and have it control your motors directly (assuming EMC ports cleanly to ARM). However a Beagle would need to use a serial port and a traditional microcontroller based motion controller to do the same.

Alas my hardware hacking free time is becoming quite infrequent. Therefore there’s no way I’m going to pull off anything like the above. You folks will have to try it and tell me how your hacking goes. I’d love to see what people are doing with clutter or android on the beagle or what kinds of cool hardware apps you’ve rigged up to the hammer.

By the way, for some reason I’m getting thousands of hits to my blog in the last couple weeks for the Hammer Board blog post. I wonder why…

Comments

Or use them both!

Jadon sent me a message on twitter showing a project that uses the two combined! Pretty slick!

BeagleBoard v.s. Hammer

I like the Hammer a lot and find the Nail Kit very interesting for learning about Embedded development. The Tin Can Tools are prized to high for what they offer by today’s standards.. I personally prefer the Hammer tools because they are more hardware hackable and the software (jtag and soc) are well documented. TI has made great progress in the last 2 years in opening specs but they still have a long way to go.

The main problem with the Hammer is concurrence from booth side. For robotic projects people use thing like Arduino that are easily programmed (and well suited). on the other side there are BeagleBoards or even x86 based PC with lcd for under 200 Euro.

The other problem for the Hammer is “Koen and the angstrom distribution on the beagle”. The excellent distro makes the Beagle Usable without to much pain for non developers.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • You can use Markdown syntax to format and style the text.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Back to top